MeTube vs Photoview
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
MeTube
Web UI for downloading video from YouTube and many sites
VS
Photoview
Simple photo gallery for personal servers
| Feature | MeTube | Photoview |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media Servers | Photo Management |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,359 | ★ 6,496 |
| First released | 2021 | 2019 |
| Replaces | YouTube Premium | Google Photos |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is MeTube or Photoview better?
Neither is universally better. MeTube has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are MeTube and Photoview free and open-source?
Yes. MeTube is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Photoview under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run MeTube and Photoview with Docker?
MeTube: yes. Photoview: yes.