Metabase vs OpenReplay
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted web analytics options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Metabase
Open-source business intelligence and dashboards
VS
OpenReplay
Self-hosted session replay and product analytics
| Feature | Metabase | OpenReplay |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Web Analytics | Web Analytics |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Clojure | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, binary | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 48,597 | ★ 12,458 |
| First released | 2015 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Tableau, Looker | FullStory, LogRocket |
Why pick each one
Choose Metabase if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 48.6k GitHub stars
- Written in Clojure
Frequently asked questions
Is Metabase or OpenReplay better?
Metabase is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider OpenReplay if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Metabase and OpenReplay free and open-source?
Yes. Metabase is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and OpenReplay under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Metabase and OpenReplay with Docker?
Metabase: yes. OpenReplay: yes.