Mercure vs Soketi
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Mercure
Real-time updates protocol and server-sent events hub
VS
Soketi
Self-hostable WebSocket server compatible with Pusher
| Feature | Mercure | Soketi |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Automation & Workflows | Chat & Communication |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,297 | ★ 5,631 |
| First released | 2019 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Pusher | Pusher |
Why pick each one
Choose Mercure if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 5.3k GitHub stars
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Mercure or Soketi better?
Soketi is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Mercure if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Mercure and Soketi free and open-source?
Yes. Mercure is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Soketi under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Mercure and Soketi with Docker?
Mercure: yes. Soketi: yes.