meli vs Mailpit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
meli
Terminal email client with a modern interface
VS
Mailpit
Email and SMTP testing tool with web UI
| Feature | meli | Mailpit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Rust | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | docker, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 877 | ★ 10,067 |
| First released | 2017 | 2022 |
| Replaces | Mutt, NeoMutt | Mailtrap, MailHog |
Why pick each one
Choose meli if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is meli or Mailpit better?
Mailpit is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider meli if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are meli and Mailpit free and open-source?
Yes. meli is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Mailpit under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run meli and Mailpit with Docker?
meli: check the project docs for container support. Mailpit: yes.