Medusa Next.js Starter vs QOR Commerce

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted e-commerce platforms options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMedusa Next.js StarterQOR Commerce
CategoryE-commerce PlatformsE-commerce Platforms
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM512 MB256 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcebare-metal, source
GitHub stars★ 2,796★ 5,342
First released20222016
ReplacesShopify themes, Saleor StorefrontShopify, Magento

Why pick each one

Choose Medusa Next.js Starter if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Medusa Next.js Starter details

Choose QOR Commerce if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Mature project with 5.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
QOR Commerce details

Frequently asked questions

Is Medusa Next.js Starter or QOR Commerce better?

Neither is universally better. QOR Commerce has the larger community, while Medusa Next.js Starter is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Medusa Next.js Starter and QOR Commerce free and open-source?

Yes. Medusa Next.js Starter is licensed under MIT and QOR Commerce under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Medusa Next.js Starter and QOR Commerce with Docker?

Medusa Next.js Starter: yes. QOR Commerce: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons