MediaCMS vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMediaCMSSRS
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageJavaScriptC++
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker
GitHub stars★ 5,047★ 29,105
First released20202025
ReplacesYouTube, Vimeo

Why pick each one

Choose MediaCMS if…

  • Active development
  • Good for video portals
MediaCMS details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is MediaCMS or SRS better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are MediaCMS and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. MediaCMS is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run MediaCMS and SRS with Docker?

MediaCMS: yes. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons