Hookshot vs SimpleX Chat
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted chat & communication options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Hookshot
Matrix bridge for GitHub, GitLab, Jira and webhooks
VS
SimpleX Chat
Private messenger without any user identifiers
| Feature | Hookshot | SimpleX Chat |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Chat & Communication | Chat & Communication |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Haskell |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal, source | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 442 | ★ 19,211 |
| First released | 2021 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Slack | Signal, WhatsApp, Telegram |
Why pick each one
Choose Hookshot if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Hookshot or SimpleX Chat better?
Neither is universally better. SimpleX Chat has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Hookshot and SimpleX Chat free and open-source?
Yes. Hookshot is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SimpleX Chat under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Hookshot and SimpleX Chat with Docker?
Hookshot: yes. SimpleX Chat: yes.