massCode vs Encrypted Pastebin

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted pastebins & snippets options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturemassCodeEncrypted Pastebin
CategoryPastebins & SnippetsPastebins & Snippets
LicenseAGPL-3.0Zlib
LanguageTypeScriptPHP
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM256 MB128 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 6,945★ 83
First released20192016
ReplacesGitHub Gist, SnippetsLabPastebin.com, GitHub Gist

Why pick each one

Choose massCode if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 6.9k GitHub stars
  • Written in TypeScript
massCode details

Choose Encrypted Pastebin if…

  • Released under the Zlib license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in PHP
Encrypted Pastebin details

Frequently asked questions

Is massCode or Encrypted Pastebin better?

Neither is universally better. massCode has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are massCode and Encrypted Pastebin free and open-source?

Yes. massCode is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Encrypted Pastebin under Zlib. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run massCode and Encrypted Pastebin with Docker?

massCode: check the project docs for container support. Encrypted Pastebin: yes.

Related comparisons