Marqo vs Quickwit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Marqo
End-to-end vector search engine for text and images
VS
Quickwit
Cloud-native search engine for logs and traces
| Feature | Marqo | Quickwit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Python | Rust |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 4,096 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 5,017 | ★ 11,471 |
| First released | 2022 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Algolia, Pinecone | Splunk, Elasticsearch |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Marqo or Quickwit better?
Neither is universally better. Quickwit has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Marqo and Quickwit free and open-source?
Yes. Marqo is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Quickwit under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Marqo and Quickwit with Docker?
Marqo: yes. Quickwit: yes.