MapProxy vs deck.gl
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
MapProxy
Tile cache and proxy for geospatial web services
VS
deck.gl
WebGL-powered framework for large-scale data visualization on maps
| Feature | MapProxy | deck.gl |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Maps & GIS | Maps & GIS |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 1,024 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 667 | ★ 14,360 |
| First released | 2010 | 2016 |
| Replaces | ArcGIS Server | Mapbox visualization, ArcGIS |
Why pick each one
Choose MapProxy if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Python
Choose deck.gl if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Mature project with 14.4k GitHub stars
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is MapProxy or deck.gl better?
Neither is universally better. deck.gl has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are MapProxy and deck.gl free and open-source?
Yes. MapProxy is licensed under Apache-2.0 and deck.gl under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run MapProxy and deck.gl with Docker?
MapProxy: yes. deck.gl: check the project docs for container support.