Mapnik vs Photon

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted maps & gis options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMapnikPhoton
CategoryMaps & GISMaps & GIS
LicenseLGPL-2.1Apache-2.0
LanguageC++Java
Setup difficultyHardMedium
Min. RAM2,048 MB4,096 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal, binary
GitHub stars★ 3,949★ 2,972
First released20062013
ReplacesGoogle Maps, MapboxGoogle Geocoding API

Why pick each one

Choose Mapnik if…

  • Released under the LGPL-2.1 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3.9k GitHub stars)
  • Written in C++
Mapnik details

Choose Photon if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Java
Photon details

Frequently asked questions

Is Mapnik or Photon better?

Neither is universally better. Mapnik has the larger community, while Photon is simpler to set up (medium difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Mapnik and Photon free and open-source?

Yes. Mapnik is licensed under LGPL-2.1 and Photon under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Mapnik and Photon with Docker?

Mapnik: yes. Photon: yes.

Related comparisons