Manticore Search vs SearX
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted search engines options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Manticore Search
Fast, low-footprint database for search
VS
SearX
The original privacy-respecting metasearch engine
| Feature | Manticore Search | SearX |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Search Engines | Search Engines |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | C++ | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | docker, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 11,928 | ★ 13,532 |
| First released | 2017 | 2014 |
| Replaces | Elasticsearch, Algolia | Google Search, Bing |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Manticore Search or SearX better?
SearX is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Manticore Search if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Manticore Search and SearX free and open-source?
Yes. Manticore Search is licensed under GPL-3.0 and SearX under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Manticore Search and SearX with Docker?
Manticore Search: yes. SearX: yes.
Related comparisons
- Manticore Search vs Apache Solr
- Manticore Search vs Elasticsearch
- SearX vs Elasticsearch
- Manticore Search vs Hound
- SearX vs Hound
- Manticore Search vs Infinity
- Manticore Search vs lnx
- Manticore Search vs Lunr.js
- SearX vs Lunr.js
- Manticore Search vs Sonic Note Meili-alt Bleve
- SearX vs Sonic Note Meili-alt Bleve