Manifest vs Supabase
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Manifest
Open-source backend defined from a single YAML file
VS
Supabase
Open-source Firebase alternative
| Feature | Manifest | Supabase |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Developer Tools & Git | Self-Hosting Platforms (PaaS) |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker, source | docker, kubernetes |
| GitHub stars | ★ 7,413 | ★ 107,678 |
| First released | 2024 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Firebase, Supabase | Firebase |
Why pick each one
Choose Manifest if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 7.4k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Manifest or Supabase better?
Neither is universally better. Supabase has the larger community, while Manifest is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Manifest and Supabase free and open-source?
Yes. Manifest is licensed under MIT and Supabase under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Manifest and Supabase with Docker?
Manifest: yes. Supabase: yes.