Maloja vs PeerTube

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMalojaPeerTube
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonTypeScript
Setup difficultyEasyHard
Min. RAM256 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metaldocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 1,767★ 15,236
First released20182018
ReplacesLast.fmYouTube, Vimeo

Why pick each one

Choose Maloja if…

  • Owns your listening data
  • Lightweight
Maloja details

Choose PeerTube if…

  • Reduces bandwidth via P2P
  • Federates with the Fediverse
PeerTube details

Frequently asked questions

Is Maloja or PeerTube better?

Neither is universally better. PeerTube has the larger community, while Maloja is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Maloja and PeerTube free and open-source?

Yes. Maloja is licensed under GPL-3.0 and PeerTube under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Maloja and PeerTube with Docker?

Maloja: yes. PeerTube: yes.

Related comparisons