Maintainerr vs SRS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMaintainerrSRS
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITMIT
LanguageTypeScriptC++
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker
GitHub stars★ 2,173★ 29,105
First released20222025
ReplacesPlex Meta Manager

Why pick each one

Choose Maintainerr if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Maintainerr details

Choose SRS if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 29.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in C++
SRS details

Frequently asked questions

Is Maintainerr or SRS better?

Neither is universally better. SRS has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Maintainerr and SRS free and open-source?

Yes. Maintainerr is licensed under MIT and SRS under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Maintainerr and SRS with Docker?

Maintainerr: yes. SRS: yes.

Related comparisons