MailHog vs Sup
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
| Feature | MailHog | Sup |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Go | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 16,107 | ★ 970 |
| First released | 2014 | 2007 |
| Replaces | Mailtrap | Mutt |
Why pick each one
Choose MailHog if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 16.1k GitHub stars
Choose Sup if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Written in Ruby
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is MailHog or Sup better?
MailHog is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Sup if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are MailHog and Sup free and open-source?
Yes. MailHog is licensed under MIT and Sup under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run MailHog and Sup with Docker?
MailHog: yes. Sup: check the project docs for container support.