MailHog vs SquirrelMail
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
MailHog
Email testing tool with a fake SMTP server
VS
SquirrelMail
Another browser-based IMAP client
| Feature | MailHog | SquirrelMail |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Mail Servers | Mail Servers |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | Go | PHP |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 64 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary, source | bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 16,107 | — |
| First released | 2014 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Mailtrap | — |
Why pick each one
Choose MailHog if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 16.1k GitHub stars
Choose SquirrelMail if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Written in PHP
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is MailHog or SquirrelMail better?
MailHog is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider SquirrelMail if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are MailHog and SquirrelMail free and open-source?
Yes. MailHog is licensed under MIT and SquirrelMail under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run MailHog and SquirrelMail with Docker?
MailHog: yes. SquirrelMail: check the project docs for container support.