MailHog vs Sieve Editor

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted mail servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMailHogSieve Editor
CategoryMail ServersMail Servers
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguageGoJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB128 MB
Deploymentdocker, binary, sourcebinary, source
GitHub stars★ 16,107★ 889
First released20142012
ReplacesMailtrapGmail filters

Why pick each one

Choose MailHog if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 16.1k GitHub stars
MailHog details

Choose Sieve Editor if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in JavaScript
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Sieve Editor details

Frequently asked questions

Is MailHog or Sieve Editor better?

Neither is universally better. MailHog has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are MailHog and Sieve Editor free and open-source?

Yes. MailHog is licensed under MIT and Sieve Editor under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run MailHog and Sieve Editor with Docker?

MailHog: yes. Sieve Editor: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons