Magic Wormhole vs Spacedrive

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted file sync & storage options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureMagic WormholeSpacedrive
CategoryFile Sync & StorageFile Sync & Storage
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonRust
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM32 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary
GitHub stars★ 22,792★ 38,732
First released20162022
ReplacesWeTransfer, AirDropGoogle Drive, Dropbox

Why pick each one

Choose Magic Wormhole if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 22.8k GitHub stars
  • Written in Python
Magic Wormhole details

Choose Spacedrive if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 38.7k GitHub stars
  • Written in Rust
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Spacedrive details

Frequently asked questions

Is Magic Wormhole or Spacedrive better?

Neither is universally better. Spacedrive has the larger community, while Magic Wormhole is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are Magic Wormhole and Spacedrive free and open-source?

Yes. Magic Wormhole is licensed under MIT and Spacedrive under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Magic Wormhole and Spacedrive with Docker?

Magic Wormhole: check the project docs for container support. Spacedrive: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons