Lyrion Music Server vs Sonus Note - Black Candy
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Lyrion Music Server
Open-source music server for Squeezebox and software players
VS
Sonus Note - Black Candy
Self-hosted Ruby on Rails music streaming server
| Feature | Lyrion Music Server | Sonus Note - Black Candy |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Media Servers | Media Servers |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Language | Perl | Ruby |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,750 | ★ 4,337 |
| First released | 2002 | 2018 |
| Replaces | Sonos, Spotify | Spotify, Apple Music |
Why pick each one
Choose Sonus Note - Black Candy if…
- Clean modern interface
- Simple to deploy
Frequently asked questions
Is Lyrion Music Server or Sonus Note - Black Candy better?
Sonus Note - Black Candy is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Lyrion Music Server if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Lyrion Music Server and Sonus Note - Black Candy free and open-source?
Yes. Lyrion Music Server is licensed under GPL-2.0 and Sonus Note - Black Candy under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Lyrion Music Server and Sonus Note - Black Candy with Docker?
Lyrion Music Server: yes. Sonus Note - Black Candy: yes.
Related comparisons
- Lyrion Music Server vs Airsonic
- Sonus Note - Black Candy vs Airsonic
- Lyrion Music Server vs Airsonic-Advanced
- Sonus Note - Black Candy vs Airsonic-Advanced
- Lyrion Music Server vs Ampache
- Sonus Note - Black Candy vs Ampache
- Lyrion Music Server vs Amperfy
- Sonus Note - Black Candy vs Amperfy
- Lyrion Music Server vs Beets
- Sonus Note - Black Candy vs Beets