Lstu vs Reduced.to
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted url shorteners options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Lstu
Let's shorten that URL, simple and ephemeral
VS
Reduced.to
Open-source modern URL shortener and link management
| Feature | Lstu | Reduced.to |
|---|---|---|
| Category | URL Shorteners | URL Shorteners |
| License | WTFPL | MIT |
| Language | Perl | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 200 | ★ 705 |
| First released | 2014 | 2022 |
| Replaces | TinyURL, Bitly | Bitly, Rebrandly |
Why pick each one
Choose Lstu if…
- Released under the WTFPL license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in Perl
Choose Reduced.to if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in TypeScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Lstu or Reduced.to better?
Neither is universally better. Reduced.to has the larger community, while Lstu is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Lstu and Reduced.to free and open-source?
Yes. Lstu is licensed under WTFPL and Reduced.to under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Lstu and Reduced.to with Docker?
Lstu: yes. Reduced.to: yes.