Convos IRC vs soju
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Convos IRC
Always-online web IRC client you can self-host
VS
soju
User-friendly IRC bouncer with multi-network support
| Feature | Convos IRC | soju |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Chat & Communication |
| License | Artistic-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Go | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, bare-metal | docker, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,188 | ★ 1,000 |
| First released | 2012 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Slack, IRCCloud | IRCCloud |
Why pick each one
Choose soju if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1k GitHub stars)
- Written in Go
Frequently asked questions
Is Convos IRC or soju better?
Convos IRC is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider soju if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Convos IRC and soju free and open-source?
Yes. Convos IRC is licensed under Artistic-2.0 and soju under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Convos IRC and soju with Docker?
Convos IRC: yes. soju: yes.