Logto vs Shibboleth Identity Provider
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Logto
Developer-friendly authentication and authorization platform
VS
Shibboleth Identity Provider
Standards-based SAML identity provider for federations
| Feature | Logto | Shibboleth Identity Provider |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 1,024 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | bare-metal, docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,305 | ★ 200 |
| First released | 2022 | 2003 |
| Replaces | Auth0, Firebase Auth, Clerk | Okta, Ping Identity |
Why pick each one
Choose Shibboleth Identity Provider if…
- Gold standard for SAML federations
- Highly configurable
Frequently asked questions
Is Logto or Shibboleth Identity Provider better?
Logto is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider Shibboleth Identity Provider if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Logto and Shibboleth Identity Provider free and open-source?
Yes. Logto is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Shibboleth Identity Provider under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Logto and Shibboleth Identity Provider with Docker?
Logto: yes. Shibboleth Identity Provider: yes.