Logto vs midPoint
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted identity & sso options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Logto
Developer-friendly authentication and authorization platform
VS
midPoint
Open-source identity governance and administration platform
| Feature | Logto | midPoint |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Identity & SSO | Identity & SSO |
| License | MPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Java |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 512 MB | 4,096 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, binary | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 14,305 | ★ 521 |
| First released | 2022 | 2011 |
| Replaces | Auth0, Firebase Auth, Clerk | SailPoint, Saviynt |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Logto or midPoint better?
Logto is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider midPoint if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are Logto and midPoint free and open-source?
Yes. Logto is licensed under MPL-2.0 and midPoint under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Logto and midPoint with Docker?
Logto: yes. midPoint: yes.