Logseq vs Beavers Notes
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted notes & knowledge base options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Logseq
Privacy-first outliner for networked thought
VS
Beavers Notes
Local-first note-taking with file-over-app philosophy
| Feature | Logseq | Beavers Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Notes & Knowledge Base | Notes & Knowledge Base |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Language | Clojure | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, bare-metal | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 44,329 | ★ 1,324 |
| First released | 2020 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Notion, Roam Research | Evernote, OneNote |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Logseq or Beavers Notes better?
Neither is universally better. Logseq has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Logseq and Beavers Notes free and open-source?
Yes. Logseq is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Beavers Notes under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Logseq and Beavers Notes with Docker?
Logseq: check the project docs for container support. Beavers Notes: check the project docs for container support.