localtunnel vs tinc
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
localtunnel
Expose your localhost to the world for testing
VS
tinc
VPN daemon that builds an encrypted mesh network
| Feature | localtunnel | tinc |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | C |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 64 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 22,440 | ★ 2,233 |
| First released | 2015 | 2003 |
| Replaces | ngrok | Hamachi, ZeroTier |
Why pick each one
Choose localtunnel if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 22.4k GitHub stars
Choose tinc if…
- Released under the GPL-2.0 license
- Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in C
- Tiny footprint — runs in 64 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is localtunnel or tinc better?
localtunnel is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider tinc if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are localtunnel and tinc free and open-source?
Yes. localtunnel is licensed under MIT and tinc under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run localtunnel and tinc with Docker?
localtunnel: yes. tinc: check the project docs for container support.