localtunnel vs PyRDP
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted remote access & vpn options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
localtunnel
Expose your localhost to the world for testing
VS
PyRDP
RDP monitoring, interception and connection library
| Feature | localtunnel | PyRDP |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Remote Access & VPN | Remote Access & VPN |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 22,440 | ★ 1,774 |
| First released | 2015 | 2018 |
| Replaces | ngrok | Microsoft RDP Gateway |
Why pick each one
Choose localtunnel if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Mature project with 22.4k GitHub stars
Choose PyRDP if…
- Released under the GPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (1.8k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
Frequently asked questions
Is localtunnel or PyRDP better?
localtunnel is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider PyRDP if its specific feature set fits your needs better.
Are localtunnel and PyRDP free and open-source?
Yes. localtunnel is licensed under MIT and PyRDP under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run localtunnel and PyRDP with Docker?
localtunnel: yes. PyRDP: yes.