localtunnel vs NPS

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturelocaltunnelNPS
CategoryRemote Access & VPNReverse Proxy & Gateways
LicenseMITGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaScriptGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB64 MB
Deploymentdocker, binarydocker, binary
GitHub stars★ 22,440★ 34,157
First released20152019
Replacesngrokngrok

Why pick each one

Choose localtunnel if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 22.4k GitHub stars
localtunnel details

Choose NPS if…

  • Released under the GPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 34.2k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
NPS details

Frequently asked questions

Is localtunnel or NPS better?

Neither is universally better. NPS has the larger community, while localtunnel is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are localtunnel and NPS free and open-source?

Yes. localtunnel is licensed under MIT and NPS under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run localtunnel and NPS with Docker?

localtunnel: yes. NPS: yes.

Related comparisons