LlamaGPT vs RAGFlow

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted self-hosted ai options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureLlamaGPTRAGFlow
CategorySelf-Hosted AISelf-Hosted AI
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageTypeScriptGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM8,192 MB8,192 MB
Deploymentdockerdocker, kubernetes
GitHub stars★ 10,943★ 87,057
First released20232024
ReplacesChatGPTNotebookLM

Why pick each one

Choose LlamaGPT if…

  • Complete privacy
  • Simple Docker setup
LlamaGPT details

Choose RAGFlow if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Mature project with 87.1k GitHub stars
RAGFlow details

Frequently asked questions

Is LlamaGPT or RAGFlow better?

Neither is universally better. RAGFlow has the larger community, while LlamaGPT is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are LlamaGPT and RAGFlow free and open-source?

Yes. LlamaGPT is licensed under MIT and RAGFlow under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run LlamaGPT and RAGFlow with Docker?

LlamaGPT: yes. RAGFlow: yes.

Related comparisons