Tinode vs Openfire Pade Plugin
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Tinode
Open-source instant messaging server
VS
Openfire Pade Plugin
Meetings and messaging plugin for Openfire
| Feature | Tinode | Openfire Pade Plugin |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Matrix & XMPP |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,452 | ★ 60 |
| First released | 2016 | 2017 |
| Replaces | WhatsApp, Slack | Zoom, Slack |
Why pick each one
Choose Openfire Pade Plugin if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Written in JavaScript
- Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Tinode or Openfire Pade Plugin better?
Neither is universally better. Tinode has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Tinode and Openfire Pade Plugin free and open-source?
Yes. Tinode is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Openfire Pade Plugin under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Tinode and Openfire Pade Plugin with Docker?
Tinode: yes. Openfire Pade Plugin: check the project docs for container support.