Tinode vs matrix-appservice-slack
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted matrix & xmpp options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Tinode
Open-source instant messaging server
VS
matrix-appservice-slack
Matrix-Slack bridge application service
| Feature | Tinode | matrix-appservice-slack |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Matrix & XMPP | Matrix & XMPP |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | Go | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | docker, binary | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 13,452 | ★ 281 |
| First released | 2016 | 2017 |
| Replaces | WhatsApp, Slack | Slack official client |
Why pick each one
Choose matrix-appservice-slack if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Tinode or matrix-appservice-slack better?
Neither is universally better. Tinode has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Tinode and matrix-appservice-slack free and open-source?
Yes. Tinode is licensed under GPL-3.0 and matrix-appservice-slack under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Tinode and matrix-appservice-slack with Docker?
Tinode: yes. matrix-appservice-slack: yes.