Lib-Jitsi-Meet vs LiveKit
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video conferencing options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Lib-Jitsi-Meet
JavaScript SDK for building Jitsi video apps
VS
LiveKit
Scalable WebRTC infrastructure for real-time audio and video
| Feature | Lib-Jitsi-Meet | LiveKit |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Conferencing | Video Conferencing |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language | TypeScript | Go |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | source | docker, kubernetes, binary |
| GitHub stars | ★ 1,416 | ★ 20,181 |
| First released | 2015 | 2021 |
| Replaces | Twilio Video | Twilio, Agora |
Why pick each one
Choose Lib-Jitsi-Meet if…
- Released under the Apache-2.0 license
- Active community (1.4k GitHub stars)
- Written in TypeScript
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Lib-Jitsi-Meet or LiveKit better?
Neither is universally better. LiveKit has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Lib-Jitsi-Meet and LiveKit free and open-source?
Yes. Lib-Jitsi-Meet is licensed under Apache-2.0 and LiveKit under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Lib-Jitsi-Meet and LiveKit with Docker?
Lib-Jitsi-Meet: check the project docs for container support. LiveKit: yes.