lazygit vs OpenSpeedTest

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturelazygitOpenSpeedTest
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseMITfree
LanguageGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, one-click
GitHub stars★ 81,130
First released20182022
ReplacesGitKraken, Sourcetree

Why pick each one

Choose lazygit if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 81.1k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
lazygit details

Choose OpenSpeedTest if…

  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • One-click install on common self-host platforms
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
OpenSpeedTest details

Frequently asked questions

Is lazygit or OpenSpeedTest better?

Neither is universally better. lazygit has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are lazygit and OpenSpeedTest free and open-source?

Yes. lazygit is licensed under MIT and OpenSpeedTest under free. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run lazygit and OpenSpeedTest with Docker?

lazygit: check the project docs for container support. OpenSpeedTest: yes.

Related comparisons