lazydocker vs Syft

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturelazydockerSyft
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM64 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcebinary, docker
GitHub stars★ 52,348★ 9,367
First released20192020
ReplacesDocker DesktopSnyk

Why pick each one

Choose lazydocker if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 52.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
lazydocker details

Choose Syft if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Mature project with 9.4k GitHub stars
Syft details

Frequently asked questions

Is lazydocker or Syft better?

Neither is universally better. lazydocker has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are lazydocker and Syft free and open-source?

Yes. lazydocker is licensed under MIT and Syft under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run lazydocker and Syft with Docker?

lazydocker: check the project docs for container support. Syft: yes.

Related comparisons