lazydocker vs RepoFlow

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturelazydockerRepoFlow
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseMIT⊘ Proprietary
LanguageGoNodejs
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 52,348
First released20192020
ReplacesDocker Desktop

Why pick each one

Choose lazydocker if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 52.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
lazydocker details

Choose RepoFlow if…

  • Released under the ⊘ Proprietary license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Written in Nodejs
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
RepoFlow details

Frequently asked questions

Is lazydocker or RepoFlow better?

lazydocker is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider RepoFlow if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are lazydocker and RepoFlow free and open-source?

Yes. lazydocker is licensed under MIT and RepoFlow under ⊘ Proprietary. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run lazydocker and RepoFlow with Docker?

lazydocker: check the project docs for container support. RepoFlow: yes.

Related comparisons