lazydocker vs Microcks

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturelazydockerMicrocks
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageGoJava
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB1,024 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, kubernetes, helm
GitHub stars★ 52,348★ 2,010
First released20192017
ReplacesDocker DesktopPostman Mock, WireMock

Why pick each one

Choose lazydocker if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 52.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
lazydocker details

Choose Microcks if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
  • Active community (2k GitHub stars)
Microcks details

Frequently asked questions

Is lazydocker or Microcks better?

lazydocker is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Microcks if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are lazydocker and Microcks free and open-source?

Yes. lazydocker is licensed under MIT and Microcks under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run lazydocker and Microcks with Docker?

lazydocker: check the project docs for container support. Microcks: yes.

Related comparisons