lazydocker vs Lura

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeaturelazydockerLura
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseMITApache-2.0
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM64 MB512 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcebare-metal
GitHub stars★ 52,348★ 6,786
First released20192025
ReplacesDocker Desktop

Why pick each one

Choose lazydocker if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 52.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
lazydocker details

Choose Lura if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Mature project with 6.8k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Lura details

Frequently asked questions

Is lazydocker or Lura better?

lazydocker is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Lura if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are lazydocker and Lura free and open-source?

Yes. lazydocker is licensed under MIT and Lura under Apache-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run lazydocker and Lura with Docker?

lazydocker: check the project docs for container support. Lura: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons