Laverna vs Logseq
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted notes & knowledge base options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Laverna
Markdown note-taking app with client-side encryption
VS
Logseq
Privacy-first outliner for networked thought
| Feature | Laverna | Logseq |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Notes & Knowledge Base | Notes & Knowledge Base |
| License | MPL-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | JavaScript | Clojure |
| Setup difficulty | Easy | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, source | binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 9,182 | ★ 44,329 |
| First released | 2014 | 2020 |
| Replaces | Evernote, Simplenote | Notion, Roam Research |
Why pick each one
Frequently asked questions
Is Laverna or Logseq better?
Neither is universally better. Logseq has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Laverna and Logseq free and open-source?
Yes. Laverna is licensed under MPL-2.0 and Logseq under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Laverna and Logseq with Docker?
Laverna: check the project docs for container support. Logseq: check the project docs for container support.