La Suite - Meet vs MiroTalk SFU
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted video conferencing options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
La Suite - Meet
Simple and Secure Video Conferencing
VS
MiroTalk SFU
Simple, secure, scalable real-time video conferences up to 4k,
| Feature | La Suite - Meet | MiroTalk SFU |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Video Conferencing | Video Conferencing |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | Python | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Medium |
| Min. RAM | 200 MB | 512 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 2,212 | ★ 3,080 |
| First released | 2025 | 2020 |
| Replaces | BigBlueButton, Jitsi, Microsoft Teams | — |
Why pick each one
Choose La Suite - Meet if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Active community (2.2k GitHub stars)
- Written in Python
- Tiny footprint — runs in 200 MB RAM
Choose MiroTalk SFU if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Active community (3.1k GitHub stars)
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is La Suite - Meet or MiroTalk SFU better?
Neither is universally better. MiroTalk SFU has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are La Suite - Meet and MiroTalk SFU free and open-source?
Yes. La Suite - Meet is licensed under MIT and MiroTalk SFU under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run La Suite - Meet and MiroTalk SFU with Docker?
La Suite - Meet: check the project docs for container support. MiroTalk SFU: yes.