LanguageTool server vs WBO

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted office suites options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureLanguageTool serverWBO
CategoryOffice SuitesOffice Suites
LicenseLGPL-2.1-onlyAGPL-3.0
LanguageJavaJavaScript
Setup difficultyEasyEasy
Min. RAM800 MB256 MB
Deploymentbare-metaldocker, source
GitHub stars★ 14,775★ 2,627
First released20232013
ReplacesMiro, Microsoft Whiteboard

Why pick each one

Choose LanguageTool server if…

  • Released under the LGPL-2.1-only license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 14.8k GitHub stars
  • Written in Java
LanguageTool server details

Choose WBO if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.6k GitHub stars)
WBO details

Frequently asked questions

Is LanguageTool server or WBO better?

Neither is universally better. LanguageTool server has the larger community; both share a easy setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are LanguageTool server and WBO free and open-source?

Yes. LanguageTool server is licensed under LGPL-2.1-only and WBO under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run LanguageTool server and WBO with Docker?

LanguageTool server: check the project docs for container support. WBO: yes.

Related comparisons