Langflow vs LlamaGPT
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted self-hosted ai options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Langflow
Visual framework for building AI agents and RAG pipelines
VS
LlamaGPT
Self-hosted offline ChatGPT-like chatbot powered by Llama
| Feature | Langflow | LlamaGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Self-Hosted AI | Self-Hosted AI |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language | Python | TypeScript |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 8,192 MB |
| Deployment | docker, kubernetes, bare-metal | docker |
| GitHub stars | ★ 152,941 | ★ 10,943 |
| First released | 2023 | 2023 |
| Replaces | Vertex AI Agent Builder | ChatGPT |
Why pick each one
Choose Langflow if…
- Released under the MIT license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Kubernetes-ready with Helm charts available
- Mature project with 152.9k GitHub stars
Frequently asked questions
Is Langflow or LlamaGPT better?
Neither is universally better. Langflow has the larger community, while LlamaGPT is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Langflow and LlamaGPT free and open-source?
Yes. Langflow is licensed under MIT and LlamaGPT under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Langflow and LlamaGPT with Docker?
Langflow: yes. LlamaGPT: yes.