Shelf Asset Management vs Spoolman

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted crm & business apps options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureShelf Asset ManagementSpoolman
CategoryCRM & Business AppsCRM & Business Apps
LicenseAGPL-3.0MIT
LanguageTypeScriptPython
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, sourcedocker
GitHub stars★ 2,766★ 2,686
First released20232026
ReplacesAsset Panda, Sortly

Why pick each one

Choose Shelf Asset Management if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.8k GitHub stars)
  • Written in TypeScript
Shelf Asset Management details

Choose Spoolman if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • First-class Docker support for quick deployment
  • Active community (2.7k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Python
Spoolman details

Frequently asked questions

Is Shelf Asset Management or Spoolman better?

Neither is universally better. Shelf Asset Management has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Shelf Asset Management and Spoolman free and open-source?

Yes. Shelf Asset Management is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Spoolman under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Shelf Asset Management and Spoolman with Docker?

Shelf Asset Management: yes. Spoolman: yes.

Related comparisons