Kubeshark vs lazydocker

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted developer tools & git options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKubesharklazydocker
CategoryDeveloper Tools & GitDeveloper Tools & Git
LicenseApache-2.0MIT
LanguageGoGo
Setup difficultyMediumEasy
Min. RAM512 MB64 MB
Deploymentbinary, helmbinary, source
GitHub stars★ 12,031★ 52,348
First released20212019
ReplacesWiresharkDocker Desktop

Why pick each one

Choose Kubeshark if…

  • Released under the Apache-2.0 license
  • Mature project with 12k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
Kubeshark details

Choose lazydocker if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Mature project with 52.3k GitHub stars
  • Written in Go
lazydocker details

Frequently asked questions

Is Kubeshark or lazydocker better?

lazydocker is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler easy setup. Consider Kubeshark if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are Kubeshark and lazydocker free and open-source?

Yes. Kubeshark is licensed under Apache-2.0 and lazydocker under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Kubeshark and lazydocker with Docker?

Kubeshark: check the project docs for container support. lazydocker: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons