KOReader vs PeerTube

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted apps from related categories — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKOReaderPeerTube
CategoryE-books & Media LibraryMedia Servers
LicenseAGPL-3.0AGPL-3.0
LanguageLuaTypeScript
Setup difficultyMediumHard
Min. RAM256 MB2,048 MB
Deploymentbinary, sourcedocker, bare-metal
GitHub stars★ 28,800★ 15,236
First released20122018
ReplacesKindle, Pocketbook readerYouTube, Vimeo

Why pick each one

Choose KOReader if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 28.8k GitHub stars
  • Written in Lua
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
KOReader details

Choose PeerTube if…

  • Reduces bandwidth via P2P
  • Federates with the Fediverse
PeerTube details

Frequently asked questions

Is KOReader or PeerTube better?

KOReader is the stronger all-round pick: it has both the larger community and the simpler medium setup. Consider PeerTube if its specific feature set fits your needs better.

Are KOReader and PeerTube free and open-source?

Yes. KOReader is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and PeerTube under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run KOReader and PeerTube with Docker?

KOReader: check the project docs for container support. PeerTube: yes.

Related comparisons