KOReader vs PDF Arranger
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted e-books & media library options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
KOReader
Document and ebook reader for e-ink and mobile devices
VS
PDF Arranger
Desktop tool to merge, split, and rearrange PDF pages
| Feature | KOReader | PDF Arranger |
|---|---|---|
| Category | E-books & Media Library | E-books & Media Library |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language | Lua | Python |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 256 MB | 256 MB |
| Deployment | binary, source | bare-metal, binary, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 28,800 | ★ 5,760 |
| First released | 2012 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Kindle, Pocketbook reader | Adobe Acrobat, PDFsam |
Why pick each one
Choose KOReader if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- Mature project with 28.8k GitHub stars
- Written in Lua
- Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is KOReader or PDF Arranger better?
Neither is universally better. KOReader has the larger community, while PDF Arranger is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are KOReader and PDF Arranger free and open-source?
Yes. KOReader is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and PDF Arranger under GPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run KOReader and PDF Arranger with Docker?
KOReader: check the project docs for container support. PDF Arranger: check the project docs for container support.