Bupstash vs Tarsnap GUI
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted backup & recovery options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Bupstash
Easy and efficient encrypted backups
VS
Tarsnap GUI
Cross-platform desktop front end for Tarsnap backups
| Feature | Bupstash | Tarsnap GUI |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Backup & Recovery | Backup & Recovery |
| License | MIT | BSD-2-Clause |
| Language | Rust | C++ |
| Setup difficulty | Medium | Easy |
| Min. RAM | 128 MB | 128 MB |
| Deployment | binary | binary, bare-metal |
| GitHub stars | ★ 924 | ★ 250 |
| First released | 2020 | 2016 |
| Replaces | Backblaze, CrashPlan | Backblaze |
Why pick each one
Choose Bupstash if…
- Released under the MIT license
- Written in Rust
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Choose Tarsnap GUI if…
- Released under the BSD-2-Clause license
- Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
- Written in C++
- Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
Frequently asked questions
Is Bupstash or Tarsnap GUI better?
Neither is universally better. Bupstash has the larger community, while Tarsnap GUI is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.
Are Bupstash and Tarsnap GUI free and open-source?
Yes. Bupstash is licensed under MIT and Tarsnap GUI under BSD-2-Clause. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Bupstash and Tarsnap GUI with Docker?
Bupstash: check the project docs for container support. Tarsnap GUI: check the project docs for container support.