Kolab Groupware vs Twake Drive
A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted groupware options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.
Not the right match-up?
Kolab Groupware
Open-source groupware server with mail and calendaring
VS
Twake Drive
Open-source collaborative file storage and workspace
| Feature | Kolab Groupware | Twake Drive |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Groupware | Groupware |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language | PHP | JavaScript |
| Setup difficulty | Hard | Hard |
| Min. RAM | 2,048 MB | 2,048 MB |
| Deployment | bare-metal, docker | docker, source |
| GitHub stars | ★ 200 | ★ 980 |
| First released | 2002 | 2019 |
| Replaces | Microsoft Exchange, Zimbra | Google Drive, Microsoft OneDrive |
Why pick each one
Choose Kolab Groupware if…
- Built on proven components
- Strong standards support
Choose Twake Drive if…
- Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
- First-class Docker support for quick deployment
- Written in JavaScript
Frequently asked questions
Is Kolab Groupware or Twake Drive better?
Neither is universally better. Twake Drive has the larger community; both share a hard setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.
Are Kolab Groupware and Twake Drive free and open-source?
Yes. Kolab Groupware is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and Twake Drive under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.
Can I run Kolab Groupware and Twake Drive with Docker?
Kolab Groupware: yes. Twake Drive: yes.