KOHighlights vs KOReader

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted e-books & media library options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKOHighlightsKOReader
CategoryE-books & Media LibraryE-books & Media Library
LicenseMITAGPL-3.0
LanguagePythonLua
Setup difficultyEasyMedium
Min. RAM128 MB256 MB
Deploymentbinarybinary, source
GitHub stars★ 262★ 28,800
First released20172012
ReplacesKindle Notebook exportKindle, Pocketbook reader

Why pick each one

Choose KOHighlights if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Easy to set up — beginner-friendly
  • Written in Python
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 128 MB RAM
KOHighlights details

Choose KOReader if…

  • Released under the AGPL-3.0 license
  • Mature project with 28.8k GitHub stars
  • Written in Lua
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 256 MB RAM
KOReader details

Frequently asked questions

Is KOHighlights or KOReader better?

Neither is universally better. KOReader has the larger community, while KOHighlights is simpler to set up (easy difficulty). Choose based on the comparison table above and your own setup.

Are KOHighlights and KOReader free and open-source?

Yes. KOHighlights is licensed under MIT and KOReader under AGPL-3.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run KOHighlights and KOReader with Docker?

KOHighlights: check the project docs for container support. KOReader: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons