Koel vs SyncTube

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKoelSyncTube
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITMIT
LanguagePHPHaxe
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB512 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 17,208★ 383
First released20162020
ReplacesSpotify

Why pick each one

Choose Koel if…

  • Beautiful interface
  • Active community
Koel details

Choose SyncTube if…

  • Released under the MIT license
  • Written in Haxe
  • Lightweight — runs in 512 MB RAM
SyncTube details

Frequently asked questions

Is Koel or SyncTube better?

Neither is universally better. Koel has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Koel and SyncTube free and open-source?

Yes. Koel is licensed under MIT and SyncTube under MIT. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Koel and SyncTube with Docker?

Koel: yes. SyncTube: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons