Koel vs Qui

A side-by-side comparison of two self-hosted media servers options — licensing, setup difficulty, resource needs, and what each one replaces.

Not the right match-up?
FeatureKoelQui
CategoryMedia ServersMedia Servers
LicenseMITGPL-2.0
LanguagePHPGo
Setup difficultyMediumMedium
Min. RAM512 MB50 MB
Deploymentdocker, bare-metalbare-metal
GitHub stars★ 17,208★ 4,328
First released20162026
ReplacesSpotifyµTorrent

Why pick each one

Choose Koel if…

  • Beautiful interface
  • Active community
Koel details

Choose Qui if…

  • Released under the GPL-2.0 license
  • Active community (4.3k GitHub stars)
  • Written in Go
  • Tiny footprint — runs in 50 MB RAM
Qui details

Frequently asked questions

Is Koel or Qui better?

Neither is universally better. Koel has the larger community; both share a medium setup difficulty, so the decision comes down to features and licensing.

Are Koel and Qui free and open-source?

Yes. Koel is licensed under MIT and Qui under GPL-2.0. Both can be self-hosted at no software cost.

Can I run Koel and Qui with Docker?

Koel: yes. Qui: check the project docs for container support.

Related comparisons